With
dollar as a reserve currency gives United States a de-facto dominant role in
the global economy. Why
will other countries subject themselves to U.S. fiscal and monetary policies
over which they have no control?
In post-world war eras where US have come out as a winner, this acceptance would have been there, but today, in 2016, the world has changed a lot.
In post-world war eras where US have come out as a winner, this acceptance would have been there, but today, in 2016, the world has changed a lot.
What happens today is that a nation’s currency is serving the
geo-politically motivated perception of a global proxy for depth, strength and
productivity of its economy and the stability of its political system. In many
cases, particularly developing countries are suffering because of this
perception. A number of developed countries while having a stable political
system are not as productive as compared to several developing countries.
Yet people residing in these countries are enjoying a higher wage rate and
luxuries for certain labor which could be produced elsewhere at much reduced
cost. While morally this is exploitation but in pure economics term, from a global
perspective, this is wastage of precious resources. This benefit of ease in
price comparison (fringe benefit will be reduced transaction cost) along with
labor mobility that is possible in today’s world outweighs everything.
Imagine a scenario; Britain has a negative shock because of fall
in the prices of its largest export. Wages in Britain must fall compared to
wages elsewhere in the world. With a global currency in play this will happen
with macroeconomic adjustment and wages will fall in real terms. Today this do
not happen , the nominal wages remain almost same and because of
’perceptive’ exchange rate mechanism the slack is mostly cut with a
slight fall in the real rates.
As we all know that theoretically currencies should be valued
based on trade flows but in reality that is flouted from both sides. While
China may have been keeping its currency exchange rate low to boost exports, on the
flip side, the developed countries have been trying to maintain a high exchange
rate to keep its transaction cost lower. Some economist will say a new form of
exploitation tool is the currency exchange rate.
There is benefit for everybody, the developed world will get a
level playing field for its industries and the developing countries will have
stable currency and free from the dependencies on foreign monetary policy.
Hegemony of exchange rate exploitation will end allowing them to benefit from
pure productivity and efficiency of their economic activity. The world
will align itself more towards the mission of Finance that is efficient
allocation of resources, no matter where in the world.
Yes there are significant hurdles to achieve that end as
monetary policy could not be enacted on a country by country basis. Any change
in monetary policy would have to be made at the worldwide level. The supply and
printing of a global currency has to be maintained by a central banking
authority, sealed from all external political interests. Unless we have a
single global government to maintain uniform fiscal and monetary policy, I
think it is almost impossible to create such an independent body with
sufficient powers to manage a world currency. As long as we have multiple
countries, we will have a collection of local economies restricted by the
political boundaries, a world currency will not help as even though the
currency/finance might flow easily, real economy will not flow easily, example
labor movement will be restricted. Politics is the horse and economy is the
cart.
The dream remains; it is just a matter of human ingenuity to
solve. To start with we are already expanding the basket of global reserve
currencies, stepping away from the dependency with dollar. Then there is
a rise of new technology, bitcoin offering the possibility of a technology
based system that works with little human intervention, this might eliminate
the conflict of the global vested interests.
Lastly I would say that this debate is same as thinking when to
go for centralization (in this global currency) vis-a vis decentralization
(local currency as it exists today). Human civilization, as a whole always had political structure which was an open decentralized system
(each country have its own system), is
one in which the entry of peers is not regulated. Any peer can enter or leave
the system at any time. The idea of money, as it was discovered while we
evolved as a society was also implemented in similar manner. There is no single
centralized authority (there are central banks for each country but not for the
whole of civilization) that makes decisions on behalf of all the parties.
Instead each party, also called a peer, makes local autonomous decisions
towards its individual goals which may possibly conflict with those of other
peers. Peers directly interact with each other and share information or provide
service to other peers.
Standing today , in the 21st century if we look at human history ,
from Mesopotomia-Mohenjadro to Ashoka-Alexander to Mao-Lenin-English
colonialism to information technology driven society of today on thing is
always common i.e. an effort to centralize and control political structure (whatever
its form is ) and reap the subsequent economic benefits of a larger financial entity. With
that trend in mind , in a global context the introduction and operation of
global currency (centralization of the currency, maybe managed via a centralized global bank )
is inevitable. It is just a matter of time , human society is inevitably is
moving towards it.
The questions is what’s next ? like any natural phenomena this
push towards centralization will reach its peak ,politically with a global
government and economically with a global currency and then ….like a cycle
decentralization will start. With higher fragmentation and entropy, what will
our society look like then ? I don’t know. Will we believe in universal human
rights then? One thing for sure whatever be it , this cycle of centralization
and decentralization will continue forever, that is the balance , the spinning Chakra.
No comments:
Post a Comment