All
along my life, till this day, I struggle with this notion of meritocracy vs
privilege. In my early child hood, I was born in a lower middle class family of
1960’s Kolkata, India. My family was not rich, barely getting by but was
very happy. Earliest memory I have on this was at elementary
school. We had to write in pencils and thus erasers (which we called
rubber) took an important place in our pencils boxes. One of my friends had
scented erasers and I did not have one, it is just that my parents could not
afford one. I was not jealous of my friend but nevertheless spurred myself to
the fact that I will try to save some money and buy one. I never did and never
could have as I did not have a pocket allowance. So when today when my son
went to school, first thing I did was to find out and buy some scented erasers
for him. This is not an issue of meritocracy over privilege but just the
fact that my friend’s parents were wealthier than mine.
In my
teenage I use to play soccer both for my school and at the Kolkata soccer
league. Compared to my age, I was fairly adept at my game and loved it with
furious passion. Playing for my school was not a big issue for me after all I
was already in the top league of junior soccer in the country. In spite of all
that the first time I tried to play for my school team my candidacy was
rejected. I was surprised, so was my parents, friends and all who knew me and
my game. No reason was given to me as to why I was dropped. I still
remember my school losing to a mediocre team while I was standing at the
sidelines as a spectator, yes literally as a spectator with all my skills.
Later I came to know that some wealthy parents kid was taken in in my position.
I really felt sad that my school would rather loose, than apply the principles
for meritocracy. Little did that young teenager, that I was, knew about
the intricacies of influence and wealth.
In my
higher secondary school years, those months of intense academic competition to
get into the professional schools of engineering and medicine I felt myself on
the privileged bus as compared to many. I was living in the city where there
good schools and colleges, and environment of positive peer pressure, could
afford the books (though marginally) whereas millions of kids, around the
country, lived in poverty, could afford neither. Then again , when contrasted
with some others I was not privileged at all , not having affluent parents who
could afford specialized academic coaching and so on. However, with consistent
hard work and a little bit of smarts I did manage to get myself admitted to one
of the leading engineering schools of India. It was there for the first time I
discovered the Government of India’s affirmative action program , a program by
which certain section of the societies (Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
) were given priority for admission to the professional schools.
‘To uplift them from the years of suppression’ definitely a noble gesture, a
privilege. I saw how it was abused where generations of very rich people sons
and daughters holding certificates of Scheduled Castes/Tribes thriving and
taking advantage of these dispensation, generation after generation, whereas
the real poor languished in the labyrinth of hopelessness, opportunity less
world and
struggled. It made me sick to the core, I revolted, but kept quiet and with
time learned to overlook it and carry on with my life.
College
was a big arena, with vast conflicting forces, so its ups and downs were also
considerable. The gap between privileged and meritocracy also grew. I saw
rich people sons and daughters with all their nurturing from early child hood
blossoming in the prime of their youth. I saw them shine as millions of others
who stood outside the gates of our college looked at the promise of a better
life slowly but surely fading away from them. Even when compared to me, a young
man from lower middle class family who somehow got into the same arena was
jostled around, almost always loosing. It was never about of meritocracy
rather privilege. They got the better job, better pay, better position,
better career path, better and more authentic promise to live a comfortable,
fruitful and meaningful life. I also got something, not left empty
handed; after all I was in the same college as they were, at the least, that
far did my meritocracy take me to.
Further
on in life, in the broader society, we all know how the idea of meritocracy has
been bent, stampeded and diluted by the societies vested forces. If only
anybody, who has exceptional abilities can really thrive and live upon
meritocracy as a pillar of life. For all the lesser mortals like us, if we cry
meritocracy then we can find ourselves shoved deeper into the perils of
uncomfortable life and insecurity. Thus to stay and survive where we are,
we keep quiet, allowing a full reign by the privileged few to pile and hoard
wealth, opportunity and everything that come with it. Not going into the
details, I can rehash the definition and say that, success in life is also
about meritocracy, but not a definite skill rather a good to have factor in a
plethora of skills.
Then
again, looking back to the millions of others who stood outside my college
gate, for whom well-heeled, consequential life slowly glided away because they
were ordinary and were not privileged, I feel empty. Is that the
difference between first world and third world? Then again within the first
world also the same exists. Is it like earth itself, with the deserts and
tropical forest, the heat and the cold? Opposite extremes will always
exist. Only thing we, our human endeavor can do is to create and maintain
the balance not surrendering to any of the extremities; the complete rich, or
complete poverty; all privilege, or all meritocracies. Can that concept exist
at all? Can society be built completely on meritocracy? What will it look
like? In human history there was none, even the early Greek Spartan society
was not. It had some institutionalized privileges.
The
very human (rather for life itself) nature of accumulating and giving
everything to its progeny stand out against the stringency of meritocracy where
fairness is singular. Then how can we build a society on those principles. We
don’t know, but what we know from the evolution of human civilization and its
political organizations, (from tribal leaders, to kings, emperors, presidents
to modern democracy) is that the notion of fairness creates a more dynamic,
stable society and in time builds a powerful country. Probably it is the only
core difference between developed world and developing one in terms of
implementation of the concept. US is more just in its dealings within
intra-race, at least amongst the euro origin white Americans than say Europe
are, in its dealings within its white citizens. In countries like India, China
fairness, the rule of meritocracy is much less when equated with US and Europe
but lot better than African countries. A step further, US at least
theoretically, is trying to evolve this concept into inter-race relations, way
ahead than any other country in the world. What about transfer of accumulated
wealth to its children. Every developed country has some sort of scheme in
place, in US it is much more intense as compared to Europe and to India , China
. It is the time, it changes things towards better allocation of financial
resources. Aristocracy on the other hand suffocates the redistribution channels
and conserves the riches for one’s family and multiple generations. A rich man may
give all his collected wealth to his not so smart children , who to his/her
children in the process over time and generations, that wealth do not get re-distributed
to meritocracy creating opportunities for a new generation to
arise. This is possible, that is why the existence of aristocracy has been
denied in America. Reverse happened in pre-colonial India, China creating huge
disparities between rich and poor leading to a weaker, fractious nation, and
was subsequently gobbled up by the colonial powers of Europe.
I do
not know whether it will be ever possible to build a perfect society based
entirely on meritocracy, at the least we can try to evolve towards it.
While acknowledging the fundamental human nature of giving ‘ all that we have’
to our children , we are sure that it is only through meritocracy, as a society
we can make our present life better and our future world ,that which our
children will inherit , best.
No comments:
Post a Comment